Transit riders leave the buses at Tunney’s Pasture station. At one point, 25 years ago, buses clogged downtown streets at rush hours, particularly on Albert and Slater streets. Photo by Ashley Fraser /PostmediaArticle content
Frustration with Ottawa’s public transit system is understandable, but the root cause is not a large number of people who made remarkably stupid decisions over a long period of time, as it is now popular to conclude.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Exclusive articles from Elizabeth Payne, David Pugliese, Andrew Duffy, Bruce Deachman and others. Plus, food reviews and event listings in the weekly newsletter, Ottawa, Out of Office.Unlimited online access to Ottawa Citizen and 15 news sites with one account.Ottawa Citizen ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Exclusive articles from Elizabeth Payne, David Pugliese, Andrew Duffy, Bruce Deachman and others. Plus, food reviews and event listings in the weekly newsletter, Ottawa, Out of Office.Unlimited online access to Ottawa Citizen and 15 news sites with one account.Ottawa Citizen ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an Accountor
Article content
Article content
In fact, it’s almost the opposite. The light-rail decisions that are mocked today were both popular and rational when they were made.
Article content
Ottawans wanted the same kind of rail service that other cities had already had for years. To accomplish that, they kept electing and re-electing politicians who promised to make the dream a reality.
Article content
Article content
People look back now and lament the loss of what they remember as a much better bus system, but there was a good reason why it had to change. It’s hard to imagine now, but 25 years ago, buses clogged downtown streets at rush hours, particularly on Albert and Slater streets.
Article content
At the time, OC Transpo was moving about 10,000 people an hour in each direction downtown at rush hours. The streets were near capacity and transit ridership was growing rapidly. Light rail in a downtown tunnel was ultimately seen as the most viable solution to that problem. It would enable OC Transpo to move up to 24,000 passengers an hour each way.
Article content
It’s fair to say that the city’s first train decision wasn’t the best. Then-mayor Bob Chiarelli wanted light rail that would run from downtown to Barrhaven, but with no tunnel. It was a short-term solution, and one that went north-south when Ottawa’s main commute was east and west to downtown. The federal government refused to support the plan.
Article content
Article content
In 2006, Ottawa voters rejected Chiarelli’s plan and elected as mayor Larry O’Brien, who became a champion of a downtown tunnel and an east-west route. It was a plan that was more costly but also more rational. O’Brien argued that trains in a tunnel would be faster and more reliable. It seemed plausible.
Article content
Article content
Rail was the ‘big city thing’ to do
Article content
The decision to go with rail was widely regarded as the big-city thing to do. Skeptics, including me, questioned the high capital cost, but enthusiasm won the day. The first stage of the LRT was under way.
Article content
In 2010, voters elected Jim Watson as mayor. He’d been critical of the train plan, but quickly changed his mind when he figured out that others liked it. In the end, Watson became an enthusiastic supporter of light rail.
Article content
Voters gave successive mayors ample support to proceed, and so they did. Once the decision to go with rail was made, there were clear implications for the city’s bus system. Nothing that has happened since should be a surprise.
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings