A map posted on the website of Evolugen shows the location of the proposed South March Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) at 2555 and 2625 Marchurst Rd. near Dubrobin. Photo by EVOLUGEN /HANDOUTArticle content
Ottawa city councillors voted to support a controversial battery energy storage system (BESS) facility in West Carleton despite the objections of rural councillors and residents who voiced their concerns as the proposal was initially rejected at a marathon 10-hour committee meeting last week.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Exclusive articles from Elizabeth Payne, David Pugliese, Andrew Duffy, Bruce Deachman and others. Plus, food reviews and event listings in the weekly newsletter, Ottawa, Out of Office.Unlimited online access to Ottawa Citizen and 15 news sites with one account.Ottawa Citizen ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Exclusive articles from Elizabeth Payne, David Pugliese, Andrew Duffy, Bruce Deachman and others. Plus, food reviews and event listings in the weekly newsletter, Ottawa, Out of Office.Unlimited online access to Ottawa Citizen and 15 news sites with one account.Ottawa Citizen ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an Accountor
Article content
More than 60 speakers lined up to speak at the agriculture and rural affairs committee meeting at Ben Franklin Place on June 5, with most in opposition to the proposed six-hectare facility on Marchurst Road in Dunrobin.
Article content
Article content
Article content
Proponents of the $650-million project say BESS facilities, which use lithium iron phosphate batteries to store electricity during off-peak periods and release it during peak-demand hours, are needed as Ontario grapples with increasing demand for energy.
Article content
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Article content
Opponents who spoke out at the committee cited environmental concerns, the potential for seepage into the water table and the possibility of fire.
Article content
The province’s Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) awarded contracts to two BESS projects in Ottawa in May 2024: one on William McEwen Drive in the Rideau-Jockvale ward and another proposed site near Fitzroy Harbour.
Article content
The Fitzroy Harbour proposal was rejected by council and was moved 13 kilometres away to Marchurst Road.
Article content
Brookfield Renewable Power Inc., through Evolugen, a Gatineau-based company, sought council’s approval of a Municipal Support Resolution (MSR), an instrument introduced by the Ontario government to gauge a municipality’s interest in building new energy projects.
Article content
Article content
The rural affairs committee rejected the Marchurst Road proposal at its June 5 meeting, but council voted 20-3 in favour of moving forward with the MSR at the June 11 city council session. Rural councillors voted against the proposal, with Rideau-Jock Coun. David Brown, West Carleton-March Coun. Clarke Kelly and Barrhaven East Coun. Wilson Lo dissenting.
Article content
Article content
According to a June 4 memo to council from the city’s strategic initiatives department, the MSR “is not a planning approval and does not commit council to any future land use decisions.”
Article content
“Council is being asked at this time to provide evidence of municipal support for a project that has been identified as a provincial energy priority,” strategic initiatives general manager Debbie Stewart said in the memo.
Article content
“While preliminary environmental screening has not identified immediate constraints, critical technical studies, detailed site layout information, and emergency services input would be forthcoming as part of the planning approval process for this project.”
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings